Sophie Teague –Sacramento, CA

In the Girls Generation video the girls appear to be liberated and owning their sexuality when they are in their ‘girl world,’ demonstrated by the suggestive dancing, all the fun they seem to be having, and their overall sassiness. However, when the scene changes and the faceless male is present, their personas change to shy, meek, T.Swift-alone-in-Paris. Their clothing also changes from the rebellious, revealing, bad-ass clothes they wear in the dance scenes and they seem to be having less fun.

It is also notable that the male gaze is pretty blatantly inferred through the placement of the male ‘behind’ the camera in those scenes where he is present. The girls look at or near the camera as if gazing adoringly at the male. This is very similar to the way that Taylor Swift looked at the man in her video; adoring, awestruck, timid, and obedient. The emphasis is on the male view of the girl instead of the other way around, despite the song being about the boy. It is interesting that this element is shared across cultures.

In the discussion on Monday the idea of marriageability was brought up in the context of the M.I.A. video. Combined with the idea of the male gaze, the Girls Generation video can be seen as a view of the quiet and submissive marriageable girl, and the out-going, liberated unmarriageable girl.

Furthermore, it could be seen as a representation of the stereotypical lady on the street/slut in bed paradox. The girls are quiet and reserved in the presence of the masculine but then there is the fierce and outgoing persona when the masculine is absent (though still the object of desire in the song).

After watching the Girls Generation video a ridiculous number of times I saw a scene right at the end that seemed to come out of nowhere. A 4:41 it shows one of the girls interacting with the male while wearing her bad-ass clothes. She looks at her watch then swings a punch at the cool, leather-wearing dude.

This scene doesn’t fit with the rest of the video and it really made me wonder what the lyrics actually say!


One thought on “Sophie Teague –Sacramento, CA

  1. I liked what you said about how the girls in both the Girls Generation and T-Swift are gazing at the male figure in timid, shy, and submissive ways, even though they are the ones singing about the guy. Even though the female(s) is/are the singer(s) and is/are supposed to be the center of the video, in some ways it’s the male figure who directs the emotions and overall text. However, as you mentioned in your post, when the male is not present, (at least for Girls Generation) the group of girls act more free, girly, and goofy because they don’t have that male eye watching them. They try on some swagg outfits, and are able to express themselves more freely. Yaya girl power! Also, I am a little puzzled about that scene at 4:41….hmm maybe they are saying in the end they don’t boys all the time, and their girlfriends are more important? I don’t know quite what to make of it…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s